wrongly reported as duplicate locusTag
This issue happens for example with accession MGYG000215993.gb: duplicate locusTag MGYG000215993_00548
The locusTag MGYG000215993_00548 actually appears just once in MGYG000215993.gb
Edited by Thomas Lacroix
This issue happens for example with accession MGYG000215993.gb: duplicate locusTag MGYG000215993_00548
The locusTag MGYG000215993_00548 actually appears just once in MGYG000215993.gb